Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021)

Unfortunately, this is just a nostaligic trip. It has all the elements from the original film, mixed in in ways that usually don't make any sense. The film cannot stand on it's own, and I find it hard to beleive that anyone who has never seen the original film nor is familairy to the franchise would get anything out of this film. As has happneed with may other sequel/reboot films, the creators of the new film seem to have seen all the elements of the original film, and included them in this film, but it's just a pale imation of the original. Didn't they even know the original film was a comedy? Always good to see Paul Rudd in any film, even so, this film didn't stand a ghost of a chance. My questions is, how do they expect to continue the franchise? How are these kids supposed to run a business busting ghosts? Their age alone makes this completely ridiculous, and not in a good way.

Dinner for Schmucks (2010)

I reviewed Jeff Dunham's filmography, and it listed that he made a movie, Dinner with Schmucks.  It also listed that he had a dummy called Diane, which I had never seen, but that dummy was said to appear in this film.  As I began to watch the film, I recall seeing Jeff Dunham's name in the opening credits, leading me to believe he played a significant role in this film.  I was mislead.

Jeff (himself) doesn't even speak in this film, and his dummy Dianne only has about 2 lines.  Not only that, but Jeff and much more prominently his dummy only have a few seconds of screen time, mostly as background characters, making their appearance in this film completely insignificant.

The role Steve Carell plays is vastly different than anything else I have ever seen him do, though I am not a big fan of Steve Carell (though I have nothing against him either).

I usually enjoy seeing Paul Rudd (whose name I didn't know until I looked it up just now, but whose face I am very familar with, since he appeared in several episodes of Friends), as he often appears as an every man, so I see myself in his place.  I used to feel this way about John Cusack, though his films in the 80's were much more outlandish.  I orginally planned to watch every film John Cusak made, ran out of steam with his 90's film.  I haven't seen many John Cusack films in over a decade, and while he has diversified characters, I feel less motivation to see his films.

This film is okay, but I feel like it's like an episode of Three Company, where something goes wrong, and is handled poorly and a small action on the part of one of the characters would clear up the situation, but no one does so (at least 'til the end).  It's the similar kind of situation, with various situations occurring based on that concept.  It gives you an embarrassed feeling though out the film, a feeling that I wish I could do something about, but the character's don't do so (to keep the plot alive).

I don't feel particularly sympathetic for Steve Carell's character and only feel like Paul Rudd should get away from him.  Even at the end of the film those feeling don't change.  It's like Steve Carell's character is just source of comedy, and it seem like a person such as him couldn't really exist, though they surely do, to some degree.